Re: [PATCH resubmit] xen-blkfront: Don't send closing notificationto backend in blkfront_closing()

[Joe Jin]

On 07/14/11 17:12, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 09:55 +0100, Joe Jin wrote:
>> On 07/14/11 16:13, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 01:47 +0100, Joe Jin wrote:
> 
>>>
>>> I'm wondering if we might not be better off deferring the disconnect on
>>> the backend side until the frontend enters XenbusStateClosed instead of
>>> doing it in closing.
>>
>> Yes this fix from backend side works too, also this looks reasonable than 
>> fix in frontend.
> 
> I guess there is either a missing "more" or "less" in that sentence ;-)
> 
> The nice thing about a backend fix is that you don't need to go round
> propagating the fix into distros etc and updating existing deployed
> guests (not to mention non-Linux frontends).

Indeed ;)

> 
> I actually thought blkback had something like this already in older
> "classic" Xen kernels but it seems like the patch never made it out of
> the XCP patch queue :-(. See
> http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/XCP/linux-2.6.32.pq.hg/file/tip/CA-7672-blkback-shutdown.patch
> (which appears to also incorporate a toolstack directed graceful
> shutdown of some sort as well as deferring the device close).
> 
> Daniel, do you know of any plans to extricate that stuff from the XCP
> patch queue for upstream? Are there any other patches (e.g. incremental
> fixes) in that pq which should go along with it?

Looking forward push this patch to upstream!

Joe 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/