Re: [PATCH next/mmotm] slab: fix DEBUG_SLAB build

From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Wed Jul 13 2011 - 11:39:59 EST


On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Hugh Dickins wrote:

> On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> >
> > > -#if ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN
> > > - if ((u32)objp & (ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN-1)) {
> > > + if ((unsigned long)objp & (ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN-1)) {
> > > printk(KERN_ERR "0x%p: not aligned to ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN=%d\n",
> >
> > Change %d to %ul for consistencies sake and drop the cast of
> > ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN?
>
> I don't think we can drop the cast of ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN, or not without
> a wander through all the architectures: it could well be defined as a bare
> integer in some of them, even if the default definition as __alignof__
> comes out as an unsigned long (which itself surprised me).

A bare integer can be handled by a %lu in a printk without the need for a
cast.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/