RE: [PATCH 01/11] MFD: DA9052 MFD core module v2

[Ashish Jangam]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arnd Bergmann [mailto:arnd@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 12:03 AM
> To: Ashish Jangam
> Cc: Mark Brown; sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Dajun;
> linaro-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] MFD: DA9052 MFD core module v2
> 
> On Monday 11 July 2011 08:57:46 Ashish Jangam wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Arnd Bergmann [mailto:arnd@xxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 8:25 PM
> > > To: Ashish Jangam
> > > Cc: Mark Brown; sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Dajun;
> > > linaro-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] MFD: DA9052 MFD core module v2
> > >
> > > On Tuesday 05 July 2011, ashishj3 wrote:
> > > > The DA9052 is a highly integrated PMIC subsystem with supply domain
> > > flexibility
> > > > to support wide range of high performance application.
> > > >
> > > > It provides voltage regulators, GPIO controller, Touch Screen, RTC,
> Battery
> > > > control and other functionality.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: David Dajun Chen <dchen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ashish Jangam <ashish.jangam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> > Can anyone ack this patch?
> 
> What do you think my message was? Reviewed-by is usually stronger than
> Acked-by, it means that I actually had a closer look and am now happy
> with the current state.
> 
> Of course, my Ack might not mean too much because I'm not a maintainer,
> but I still would expect to be included in 'anyone'.
> 
> 	Arnd
Sorry for that, since I was not much familiar with this terminology.

Ashish


èº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËlzwm…ébëæìr¸›zX§»®w¥Š{ayºÊÚë,j­¢f£¢·hš‹àz¹®w¥¢¸¢·¦j:+v‰¨ŠwèjØm¶Ÿÿ¾«‘êçzZ+ƒùšŽŠÝj"ú!¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^¶m§ÿðÃnÆàþY&—