Re: [PATCH] Remove incorrect usage of sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure

From: Steven Whitehouse
Date: Mon Jul 11 2011 - 06:33:37 EST


Hi,

On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 12:00 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 02:56:23AM +0530, raghu.prabhu13@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > In shrinker functions, sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure variable is being used while
> > trimming slab caches in general and not restricted to inode/dentry caches as
> > documented for that sysctl.
> >
> > Raghavendra D Prabhu (1):
> > mm/vmscan: Remove sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure from non-vfs shrinkers
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 2 +-
>
> That's the only questionable use of it as it has nothing to do with
> filesystems.
>
> > fs/gfs2/glock.c | 2 +-
> > fs/gfs2/quota.c | 2 +-
> > fs/mbcache.c | 2 +-
> > fs/nfs/dir.c | 2 +-
> > fs/quota/dquot.c | 3 +--
> > net/sunrpc/auth.c | 2 +-
>
> All the others are filesystemâspecific caches and as such the use of
> vfs_cache_pressure to adjust the balance of reclaim is valid usage.
> Especially the VFS quota cache shrinkers. ;)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.

I agree for the two GFS2 uses of this variable. There is no need to make
this change,

Steve.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/