[104/107] xfrm: Fix off by one in the replay advance functions

From: Greg KH
Date: Fri Jul 08 2011 - 01:06:19 EST


2.6.39-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------


From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@xxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit e756682c8baa47da1648c0c016e9f48ed66bc32d ]

We may write 4 byte too much when we reinitialize the anti replay
window in the replay advance functions. This patch fixes this by
adjusting the last index of the initialization loop.

Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static void xfrm_replay_advance_bmp(stru
bitnr = bitnr & 0x1F;
replay_esn->bmp[nr] |= (1U << bitnr);
} else {
- nr = replay_esn->replay_window >> 5;
+ nr = (replay_esn->replay_window - 1) >> 5;
for (i = 0; i <= nr; i++)
replay_esn->bmp[i] = 0;

@@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ static void xfrm_replay_advance_esn(stru
bitnr = bitnr & 0x1F;
replay_esn->bmp[nr] |= (1U << bitnr);
} else {
- nr = replay_esn->replay_window >> 5;
+ nr = (replay_esn->replay_window - 1) >> 5;
for (i = 0; i <= nr; i++)
replay_esn->bmp[i] = 0;



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/