[032/107] xen/pci: Move check for acpi_sci_override_gsi to xen_setup_acpi_sci.

From: Greg KH
Date: Fri Jul 08 2011 - 01:02:06 EST


2.6.39-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit ee339fe63ac408e4604c1c88b1f9a428f2511b70 upstream.

Previously we would check for acpi_sci_override_gsi == gsi every time
a PCI device was enabled. That works during early bootup, but later
on it could lead to triggering unnecessarily the acpi_gsi_to_irq(..) lookup.
The reason is that acpi_sci_override_gsi was declared in __initdata and
after early bootup could contain bogus values.

This patch moves the check for acpi_sci_override_gsi to the
site where the ACPI SCI is preset.

Reported-by: Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
[http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2011-07/msg00154.html]
Suggested-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>

---
arch/x86/pci/xen.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
@@ -316,13 +316,12 @@ int __init pci_xen_hvm_init(void)
}

#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_DOM0
-static int xen_register_pirq(u32 gsi, int triggering)
+static int xen_register_pirq(u32 gsi, int gsi_override, int triggering)
{
int rc, pirq, irq = -1;
struct physdev_map_pirq map_irq;
int shareable = 0;
char *name;
- bool gsi_override = false;

if (!xen_pv_domain())
return -1;
@@ -334,31 +333,12 @@ static int xen_register_pirq(u32 gsi, in
shareable = 1;
name = "ioapic-level";
}
-
pirq = xen_allocate_pirq_gsi(gsi);
if (pirq < 0)
goto out;

- /* Before we bind the GSI to a Linux IRQ, check whether
- * we need to override it with bus_irq (IRQ) value. Usually for
- * IRQs below IRQ_LEGACY_IRQ this holds IRQ == GSI, as so:
- * ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 low level)
- * but there are oddballs where the IRQ != GSI:
- * ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 20 low level)
- * which ends up being: gsi_to_irq[9] == 20
- * (which is what acpi_gsi_to_irq ends up calling when starting the
- * the ACPI interpreter and keels over since IRQ 9 has not been
- * setup as we had setup IRQ 20 for it).
- */
- if (gsi == acpi_sci_override_gsi) {
- /* Check whether the GSI != IRQ */
- acpi_gsi_to_irq(gsi, &irq);
- if (irq != gsi)
- /* Bugger, we MUST have that IRQ. */
- gsi_override = true;
- }
- if (gsi_override)
- irq = xen_bind_pirq_gsi_to_irq(irq, pirq, shareable, name);
+ if (gsi_override >= 0)
+ irq = xen_bind_pirq_gsi_to_irq(gsi_override, pirq, shareable, name);
else
irq = xen_bind_pirq_gsi_to_irq(gsi, pirq, shareable, name);
if (irq < 0)
@@ -381,7 +361,7 @@ out:
return irq;
}

-static int xen_register_gsi(u32 gsi, int triggering, int polarity)
+static int xen_register_gsi(u32 gsi, int gsi_override, int triggering, int polarity)
{
int rc, irq;
struct physdev_setup_gsi setup_gsi;
@@ -392,7 +372,7 @@ static int xen_register_gsi(u32 gsi, int
printk(KERN_DEBUG "xen: registering gsi %u triggering %d polarity %d\n",
gsi, triggering, polarity);

- irq = xen_register_pirq(gsi, triggering);
+ irq = xen_register_pirq(gsi, gsi_override, triggering);

setup_gsi.gsi = gsi;
setup_gsi.triggering = (triggering == ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE ? 0 : 1);
@@ -414,6 +394,8 @@ static __init void xen_setup_acpi_sci(vo
int rc;
int trigger, polarity;
int gsi = acpi_sci_override_gsi;
+ int irq = -1;
+ int gsi_override = -1;

if (!gsi)
return;
@@ -430,7 +412,25 @@ static __init void xen_setup_acpi_sci(vo
printk(KERN_INFO "xen: sci override: global_irq=%d trigger=%d "
"polarity=%d\n", gsi, trigger, polarity);

- gsi = xen_register_gsi(gsi, trigger, polarity);
+ /* Before we bind the GSI to a Linux IRQ, check whether
+ * we need to override it with bus_irq (IRQ) value. Usually for
+ * IRQs below IRQ_LEGACY_IRQ this holds IRQ == GSI, as so:
+ * ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 low level)
+ * but there are oddballs where the IRQ != GSI:
+ * ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 20 low level)
+ * which ends up being: gsi_to_irq[9] == 20
+ * (which is what acpi_gsi_to_irq ends up calling when starting the
+ * the ACPI interpreter and keels over since IRQ 9 has not been
+ * setup as we had setup IRQ 20 for it).
+ */
+ /* Check whether the GSI != IRQ */
+ if (acpi_gsi_to_irq(gsi, &irq) == 0) {
+ if (irq >= 0 && irq != gsi)
+ /* Bugger, we MUST have that IRQ. */
+ gsi_override = irq;
+ }
+
+ gsi = xen_register_gsi(gsi, gsi_override, trigger, polarity);
printk(KERN_INFO "xen: acpi sci %d\n", gsi);

return;
@@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ static __init void xen_setup_acpi_sci(vo
static int acpi_register_gsi_xen(struct device *dev, u32 gsi,
int trigger, int polarity)
{
- return xen_register_gsi(gsi, trigger, polarity);
+ return xen_register_gsi(gsi, -1 /* no GSI override */, trigger, polarity);
}

static int __init pci_xen_initial_domain(void)
@@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ void __init xen_setup_pirqs(void)
if (acpi_get_override_irq(irq, &trigger, &polarity) == -1)
continue;

- xen_register_pirq(irq,
+ xen_register_pirq(irq, -1 /* no GSI override */,
trigger ? ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE : ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE);
}
}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/