RE: [PATCH 00/40] Staging: hv: Driver cleanup

[KY Srinivasan]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:shemminger@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 12:45 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig; devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/40] Staging: hv: Driver cleanup
> 
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 00:19:38 +0000
> KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:shemminger@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 7:48 PM
> > > To: KY Srinivasan
> > > Cc: Christoph Hellwig; devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxx; linux-
> > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/40] Staging: hv: Driver cleanup
> > >
> > > On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:32:34 +0000
> > > KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 3:34 PM
> > > > > To: KY Srinivasan
> > > > > Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > > > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/40] Staging: hv: Driver cleanup
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 07:38:21AM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> > > > > > Further cleanup of the hv drivers:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 	1) Cleanup the reference counting mess for both stor and net
> devices.
> > > > >
> > > > > I really don't understand the need for reference counting on the storage
> > > > > side, especially now that you only have a SCSI driver.  The SCSI
> > > > > midlayer does proper counting on it's objects (Scsi_Host, scsi_device,
> > > > > scsi_cmnd), so you'll get that for free given that SCSI drivers just
> > > > > piggyback on the midlayer lifetime rules.
> > > > >
> > > > > For now your patches should probably go in as-is, but mid-term you
> > > > > should be able to completely remove that code on the storage side.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Greg,
> > > >
> > > > I am thinking of  going back to my original implementation where I had one
> scsi
> > > host
> > > > per IDE device. This will certainly simply the code. Let me know what you
> think.
> > > If you
> > > > agree with this approach, please drop this patch-set, I will send you a new
> set
> > > of patches.
> > >
> > > I think there ref counting on network devices is also unneeded
> > > as long as the unregister logic handles RCU correctly. The network layer
> > > calls the driver unregister routine after all packets are gone.
> > On the networking side, what about incoming packets that may be racing
> > with the device destruction. The current ref counting scheme deals with
> > that case.
> 
> Not sure how HV driver tells hypervisor to stop sending packets. But the
> destructor is not called until after all other CPU's are done processing
> packets from that device.

The issue I was concerned is one where, on packet reception, we need
to de-reference the ext field in the struct hv_device (this is the pointer
to the net device and this could happen concurrently with the guest
trying to shut-down the device. In the current code we deal with this
condition.

Regards,

K. Y  
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/