Re: [PATCH 0/3 v3] rcu: Detect rcu uses under extended quiescentstate

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 08:53:11PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 01:12:37AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > This time I have no current practical cases to fix. Those I fixed
> > in previous versions were actually using rcu_dereference_raw(), which
> > is legal in extended qs.
> > 
> > Frederic Weisbecker (3):
> >   rcu: Detect illegal rcu dereference in extended quiescent state
> >   rcu: Inform the user about dynticks idle mode on PROVE_RCU warning
> >   rcu: Warn when rcu_read_lock() is used in extended quiescent state
> > 
> >  include/linux/rcupdate.h |   68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >  kernel/lockdep.c         |    4 +++
> >  kernel/rcupdate.c        |    4 +++
> >  kernel/rcutiny.c         |   13 +++++++++
> >  kernel/rcutree.c         |   14 +++++++++
> >  5 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> Queued, thank you, Frederic!
> 
> I have also applied your approach to SRCU, and I applied the following
> to simplify the code a bit -- please let me know if there are any
> problems with this approach.
> 
> 							Thanx, Paul
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> rcu: Remove one layer of abstraction from PROVE_RCU checking
> 
> Simplify things a bit by substituting the definitions of the single-line
> rcu_read_acquire(), rcu_read_release(), rcu_read_acquire_bh(),
> rcu_read_release_bh(), rcu_read_acquire_sched(), and
> rcu_read_release_sched() functions at their call points.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Yeah looks good. Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/