Re: [PATCH trivial] stop_machine.h: "disables preeempt" -> "disablespreemption"

[Jiri Kosina]

On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Jonathan NeuschÃfer wrote:

> Use the noun instead of a misspelled verb.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan NeuschÃfer <j.neuschaefer@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/stop_machine.h |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/stop_machine.h b/include/linux/stop_machine.h
> index 092dc9b..2d3f0b1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/stop_machine.h
> +++ b/include/linux/stop_machine.h
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static inline int try_stop_cpus(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
>   * stop_machine "Bogolock": stop the entire machine, disable
>   * interrupts.  This is a very heavy lock, which is equivalent to
>   * grabbing every spinlock (and more).  So the "read" side to such a
> - * lock is anything which disables preeempt.
> + * lock is anything which disables preemption.

If there wouldn't be the typo, I'd gladly keep the old version there. But 
with the typo being there anyway ... applied.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/