Re: [RFC 0/5 v4] procfs: introduce hidepid=, hidenet=, gid= mount options

From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Thu Jun 16 2011 - 07:40:26 EST

On Thursday 16 June 2011, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> > I have no opinion on whether it's a good idea to include the feature or not.
> Why not? Have you some specific complains where it can be perhaps too
> strong/insufficient/non-configurable?

No, not at all. I just haven't had the need for this myself, and I'm not
enough of a security person to judge whether the vulnerability addressed
by the patch is a relevant one. E.g. if all the sensitive information
you are hiding in procfs is still available through netlink, your patch
is pointless. Similarly if there is no recorded case of an attack that
relies on any of the information in procfs.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at