RE: [PATCH] staging/hv: Fix memory leak of storvsc_dev_add()

From: KY Srinivasan
Date: Wed Jun 01 2011 - 08:28:49 EST




> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:devel-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andre Bartke
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 5:46 PM
> To: gregkh@xxxxxxx
> Cc: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Andre Bartke; Haiyang Zhang; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [PATCH] staging/hv: Fix memory leak of storvsc_dev_add()
>
> stor_device is not freed in storvsc_dev_add()
> causing a memory leak in case of an allocation error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Bartke <andre.bartke@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/hv/storvsc.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/hv/storvsc.c b/drivers/staging/hv/storvsc.c
> index 06cd327..92b44f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/hv/storvsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/hv/storvsc.c
> @@ -414,6 +414,7 @@ int storvsc_dev_add(struct hv_device *device,
> device_info->target_id = stor_device->target_id;
>
> cleanup:
> + free_stor_device(stor_device);
> return ret;

Was this patch tested? Even the normal path falls through the cleanup label
and obviously you should not be freeing the stor_device in that case. I have
patches queued up to cleanup some of the unnecessary labels and meaningless
return values that I will be sending soon.

Regards,

K. Y



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/