[153/165] SUNRPC: Deal with the lack of a SYN_SENT sk->sk_state_change

From: Greg KH
Date: Wed Jun 01 2011 - 04:28:48 EST


2.6.39-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------
callback...
Content-Length: 1759
Lines: 59

From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit fe19a96b10032035a35779f42ad59e35d6dd8ffd upstream.

The TCP connection state code depends on the state_change() callback
being called when the SYN_SENT state is set. However the networking layer
doesn't actually call us back in that case.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>

---
net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
@@ -1344,7 +1344,6 @@ static void xs_tcp_state_change(struct s
case TCP_CLOSE_WAIT:
/* The server initiated a shutdown of the socket */
xprt_force_disconnect(xprt);
- case TCP_SYN_SENT:
xprt->connect_cookie++;
case TCP_CLOSING:
/*
@@ -1758,6 +1757,7 @@ static void xs_tcp_reuse_connection(stru
static int xs_tcp_finish_connecting(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, struct socket *sock)
{
struct sock_xprt *transport = container_of(xprt, struct sock_xprt, xprt);
+ int ret = -ENOTCONN;

if (!transport->inet) {
struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
@@ -1789,12 +1789,22 @@ static int xs_tcp_finish_connecting(stru
}

if (!xprt_bound(xprt))
- return -ENOTCONN;
+ goto out;

/* Tell the socket layer to start connecting... */
xprt->stat.connect_count++;
xprt->stat.connect_start = jiffies;
- return kernel_connect(sock, xs_addr(xprt), xprt->addrlen, O_NONBLOCK);
+ ret = kernel_connect(sock, xs_addr(xprt), xprt->addrlen, O_NONBLOCK);
+ switch (ret) {
+ case 0:
+ case -EINPROGRESS:
+ /* SYN_SENT! */
+ xprt->connect_cookie++;
+ if (xprt->reestablish_timeout < XS_TCP_INIT_REEST_TO)
+ xprt->reestablish_timeout = XS_TCP_INIT_REEST_TO;
+ }
+out:
+ return ret;
}

/**


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/