Re: [PATCH] SCSI IOCTL: Check for device deletion [was Re:__elv_add_request OOPS]

[James Bottomley]

On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 15:52 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 16:42 -0400, Parag Warudkar wrote:
> > Yeah - that makes sense. By that logic, looks like we can only disallow 
> > for SDEV_DEL (if we decide to do that check here).
> 
> I don't think this is the root cause.  I think q is non-NULL but has
> already been released, so we're just getting a NULL deref on the actual
> list head.
> 
> Does this fix it?  It adds the refcounting at approximately the correct
> places.  Of course, we'll now be trying elevator operations on an extant
> queue but one whose elevator functions have been destroyed, so there are
> probably additional state guards to place.
> 
> James
> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> index 58584dc..44e8ca3 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static struct scsi_device *scsi_alloc_sdev(struct scsi_target *starget,
>  		kfree(sdev);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
> -
> +	blk_get_queue(sdev->request_queue);

Apparently we can't do this because blk_[put|get]_queue aren't exported
for use in modules (and SCSI can be modular), so this caused a build
failure in linux-next.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/