Re: [PATCH-v5 07/13] iscsi-target: Add iSCSI Login Negotiation +Parameter logic

From: Nicholas A. Bellinger
Date: Thu May 26 2011 - 15:15:36 EST


On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 11:46 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 20:37 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This patch adds the princple RFC-3720 compatiable iSCSI Login
> > phase negotiation for iscsi_target_mod. This also includes the
> > target RX/TX thread queue logic which is called directly from iSCSI
> > login associated code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I thought the upshot of the thread with Tomo was that we wouldn't be
> doing all of this in-kernel. Where's the userspace upcall for this?
>

The technical reasons why I want to avoid this have not changed for the
1) authentication disabled and 2) 'required-to-implement' CHAP
authentication cases. These where discussed at the bottom of the thread
from March with Tomo-san here:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=130108812405710&w=2

As mentioned, I am open to adding a userspace upcall for authentication
payloads post merge in order to support the 'optional-to-implement'
authentication cases. However, pushing the above two cases out to
userspace really does add unnecessary complexity and limitiations that I
want to avoid for the default iSCSI login cases.

It also would break existing rtslib/rtsadmin-v2 userspace code, and
require a userspace daemon be aware of the necessary initiator NodeACL
information and keep the current configuration state in sync between
kernel + userspace. The current code avoids this type of mess all
together for the default cases, and I still only see downsides and
endless maintainability headaches and delays for going back to this type
of design for a kernel-level iscsi-target.

--nab


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/