Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc: Force page alignment for initrd reserved memory

From: 'Milton Miller'
Date: Sun May 22 2011 - 17:17:33 EST


On Sat, 21 May 2011 about 11:05:27 -0600, Dave Carroll wrote:
>
> When using 64K pages with a separate cpio rootfs, U-Boot will align
> the rootfs on a 4K page boundary. When the memory is reserved, and
> subsequent early memblock_alloc is called, it will allocate memory
> between the 64K page alignment and reserved memory. When the reserved
> memory is subsequently freed, it is done so by pages, causing the
> early memblock_alloc requests to be re-used, which in my case, caused
> the device-tree to be clobbered.
>
> This patch forces the reserved memory for initrd to be kernel page
> aligned, and adds the same range extension when freeing initrd.

Getting better, but

>
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Carroll <dcarroll@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c | 4 +++-
> arch/powerpc/mm/init_32.c | 3 +++
> arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
> index 48aeb55..397d4a0 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
> @@ -555,7 +555,9 @@ static void __init early_reserve_mem(void)
> #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD
> /* then reserve the initrd, if any */
> if (initrd_start && (initrd_end > initrd_start))

Here you test the unaligned values

> void free_initrd_mem(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> {
> + start = _ALIGN_DOWN(start, PAGE_SIZE);
> + end = _ALIGN_UP(end, PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> if (start < end)
> printk ("Freeing initrd memory: %ldk freed\n", (end - start) >> 10);

But here you test the aligned values. And they are aligned with
opposite bias. Which means that if start == end (or is less than,
but within the same page), a page that wasn't reserved (same
32 and 64 bit) gets freed.

I thought "what happens if we are within a page of end, could we
free the last page of bss?", but then I checked vmlinux.lds and we
align end to page size. I thought other allocations should be safe,
but then remembered:

The flattened device tree (of which we continue to use the string
table after boot) could be a problem.

milton

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/