Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: Correctly check if reclaimer should scheduleduring shrink_slab

[Minchan Kim]

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Colin Ian King
<colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 09:09 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> Hi Colin.
>>
>> Sorry for bothering you. :(
>
> No problem at all, I've very happy to re-test.
>
>> I hope this test is last.
>>
>> We(Mel, KOSAKI and me) finalized opinion.
>>
>> Could you test below patch with patch[1/4] of Mel's series(ie,
>> !pgdat_balanced Âof sleeping_prematurely)?
>> If it is successful, we will try to merge this version instead of
>> various cond_resched sprinkling version.
>
> tested with the patch below + patch[1/4] of Mel's series. Â300 cycles,
> 2.5 hrs of soak testing: works OK.
>
> Colin

Thanks, Colin.
We are approaching the conclusion for  your help. :)

Mel, KOSAKI.
I will ask test to Andrew Lutomirski.
If he doesn't have a problem, let's go, then.

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/