Re: [PATCH] staging: brcm80211: brcmfmac: Add and use dhd_dbg

[Henry Ptasinski]

On 05/18/2011 11:23 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> All uses of DHD_<TYPE>  macros are for debugging only.
>
> Change the multiple uses of DHD_<TYPE>((...)) to dhd_dbg(TYPE, ...)
> for a more consistent style.

I generally like this approach, but in brcmsmac we've been switching to 
wiphy_err() and related instead.  Any strong argument for one over the 
other?

> -       DHD_TRACE(("%s: Enter\n", __func__));
> +       dhd_dbg(TRACE, "%s: Enter\n", __func__);


I'd propose moving __func__ into the macro definition itself, which 
would help ensure consistency (and shorten all the debug lines a bit).

Also, perhaps rename to "brcm_dbg()", "bcm_dbg()" or something like that 
and move it into include/bcmutils.h, so brcmsmac can use it as well.

- Henry

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/