Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: new ethtool stat "tx_timeout" to account for tx_timeouts

[David Decotigny]

Hi David,

They should be independent and applicable in any order, except for the
two 'PATCH x/2' which have to go together.

FYI, here is the order in which I'm applying them:
1/ forcedeth: Improve stats counters
2/ forcedeth: new ethtool stat "tx_timeout" to account for tx_timeouts
3/ [PATCH 1/2] forcedeth: make module parameters readable in /sys/module
4/ [PATCH 2/2] forcedeth: allow to silence tx_timeout debug messages
5/ forcedeth: Acknowledge only interrupts that are being processed
6/ forcedeth: Add messages to indicate using MSI or MSI-X
7/ forcedeth: Fix a race during rmmod of forcedeth

Sorry for that.
Regards,

--
David Decotigny



On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:14 PM, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> When submitting multiple patches in a patch set, NUMBER THEM.
>
> Otherwise there is no unambiguous way to figure out what order
> I should apply these patches.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/