Re: [PATCH 4/4] watchdog: configure nmi watchdog period based onwatchdog_thresh

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Tue May 17 2011 - 14:47:57 EST



* Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 09:16:42AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Hm, our tolerance for the two thresholds is not just human but technical: hard
> > lockup warnings should indeed be triggered after just a few seconds, soft
> > lockups can have false positives under extreme conditions.
> >
> > So we generally want a higher threshold for soft lockups than for hard lockups.
> >
> > So how about we couple the thresholds with a factor: we make the soft threshold
> > twice the amount of time the hard threshold is? Then we could change the
> > upstream default as well i think: lets change the NMI timeout to 10 seconds
> > (and thus have the soft threshold at 20 seconds). Is 20 seconds short enough
> > for most users to not hit reset?
>
> Making softlockup twice as long as hardlockup seems to make sense.
> Setting the hardlockup to 10 seconds can be ok, but then you get into
> power savings issues. For example, I have the timers setup to trigger 5
> times a period (I know it probably should be 2 times), so at 10 seconds
> that means the timers are firing every 2 seconds. That shows up on
> powertop :-(. Though I was flirting with the idea of trying to slow down
> or stop the timer when the cpu goes into deeper c-states. But that is a
> different problem.
>
> >
> > We might want to change another aspect of the NMI watchdog: right now it tries
> > to abort the offending task - which is really nasty if there was a spuriously
> > long irqs-off section somewhere in the kernel. How about we just print a
> > warning instead?
>
> I dont understand this. IIRC NMI watchdog will either printk or panic on
> a hardlockup. What do you mean by 'aborting' the task?

Oh, simple dementia on my side. We used to attempt a do_exit() in some long
gone version of that code :-)

Thanks,

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/