Re: [PATCH][WAS:bcmai,axi] bcma: add Broadcom specific AMBA bus driver

[RafaÅ MiÅecki]

2011/5/7 Arend van Spriel <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 05/07/2011 03:55 PM, Michael BÃsch wrote:
>>
>>> Arnd: did you have a look at defines at all?
>>>
>>> Most of the defines have values in range 0x800 â 0x837. Converting
>>> this to array means loosing 0x800 u16 entries. We can not use 0x800
>>> offset, because there are also some defined between 0x000 and 0x800:
>>> #define BCMA_CORE_OOB_ROUTER Â Â Â Â Â 0x367 Â /* Out of band */
>>> #define BCMA_CORE_INVALID Â Â Â Â Â Â Â0x700
>
> Please be aware that the core identifier itself is not unique (in the
> current list they are). In the scan the BCMA_CORE_OOB_ROUTER will always
> show BCMA_MANUF_ARM (did not look up the proper manufacturer define but you
> get the idea, i hope).

Unfortunately, I don't. Could you explain this? How core identified
can be not unique? Can 0x800 mean ChipCommon but also SuperPCIeX?

-- 
RafaÅ
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/