Re: [PATCH] cpumask: alloc_cpumask_var() use NUMA_NO_NODE

[Andrew Morton]

On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 23:17:15 +0900 (JST)
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> NUMA_NO_NODE and numa_node_id() are different meanings. NUMA_NO_NODE 
> is obviously recomended fallback.
> 
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  lib/cpumask.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/cpumask.c b/lib/cpumask.c
> index 4f6425d..af3e581 100644
> --- a/lib/cpumask.c
> +++ b/lib/cpumask.c
> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(zalloc_cpumask_var_node);
>   */
>  bool alloc_cpumask_var(cpumask_var_t *mask, gfp_t flags)
>  {
> -	return alloc_cpumask_var_node(mask, flags, numa_node_id());
> +	return alloc_cpumask_var_node(mask, flags, NUMA_NO_NODE);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(alloc_cpumask_var);
>  

So effectively this will replace numa_node_id() with numa_mem_id(),
yes?  What runtime effects might this have?  
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/