Re: [RFC patch 29/32] trace event asoc remove semicolons

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

* Mark Brown (broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 05:11:52PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > Part of the gradual TRACE_EVENT() semicolon removal. Enables creation of array
> > of events, thus saving space for trace event probes.
> 
> Can I apply this in my tree or does this depend on some earlier patch I
> don't have?

Hi Mark,

This depends on a preliminary ftrace cleanup patch I just forwarded to
you. LKML has eaten that patch due to too many CC. [ insert favorite
expression of frustration here ]. But I think the best way to proceed
would be to get a Acked-by from you and let Steven pull the patch
through the tracing tree.

> 
> > +#ifndef _TRACE_ASOC_DEF_
> > +#define _TRACE_ASOC_DEF_
> > +
> >  struct snd_soc_jack;
> >  struct snd_soc_codec;
> >  struct snd_soc_card;
> >  struct snd_soc_dapm_widget;
> >  
> > +#endif /* _TRACE_ASOC_DEF_ */
> 
> This is an unrelated change and should be split out.  Frankly I'm not
> that this is an improvement anyway, the struct declarations aren't going
> to do any harm...

Yes, this change is related, because these declarations will cause harm.
The structure declaration cannot be put within an array declaration,
because then they won't be simply "ignored": they will try to declare
structures within an array, which is not valid. This is why I did this
change in the same patch.

Thanks,

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/