Re: [PATCH 1/3] i2c: append hardware lock with bus lock

From: Jean Delvare
Date: Mon May 02 2011 - 05:47:24 EST


On Mon, 2 May 2011 10:27:34 +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:15:44PM +0800, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> > Both AP and CP are contained in Marvell PXA910 silicon. These two ARM
> > cores are sharing one pair of I2C pins.
> >
> > In order to keep I2C transaction operated with atomic, hardware lock
> > (RIPC) is required. Because of this, bus lock in AP side can't afford
> > this requirement. Now hardware lock is appended.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Right, this looks like a reasonable explanation of what is going on here
> and if Jean is happy with the core changes I'll look at where the driver
> change can go.

Yes I am!

Let me know if you want me to take the core change in my tree or if you
prefer to have it in yours to avoid a dependency.

--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/