Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/4] clock_rtoffset: new syscall

[Alexander Shishkin]

On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:32:13 +0200 (CEST), Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Alexander,
> 
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 16:02 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> > > The completely untested patch below should solve the same problem in a
> > > sane way. Restricted to timerfd, but that really should be sufficient.
> > 
> > > Subject: timerfd: Allow timers to be cancelled when clock was set
> > > From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 14:16:42 +0200
> > 
> > Seems to work fine for me here for the weird "cron timer" case, or the
> > simple "desktop clock" use-case -- where we want to rely on the timer to
> > let the process sleep as long as possible, but wake it up to recalculate
> > the next wakeup in case anything has changed in the meantime.
> 
> is that sufficient to solve your problems as well?

Yes, it looks to be.

Thanks,
--
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/