Re: [PATCH 00/69] faster tree-based sysctl implementation

From: Eric W. Biederman
Date: Sun May 01 2011 - 23:26:46 EST


Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> For long term maintainability and comprehensibility I think moving
>> sysctl in the direction of a normal filesystem makes a lot of sense.
>
> Ok, I agree that a later redesign of sysctl would suffer if there
> would be a mess regarding registration/unregistration of directories
> and no ownership information/enforcement. I'll see how this can be
> addressed in the next respin of this series.

Thanks.

Eric

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/