Re: [PATCH 2/2] fork: avoid weak function arch_dup_task_struct

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 05/01/2011 12:25 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 16:26:35 +0200 Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Avoid potential gcc bug by not using a weak function for
>> arch_dup_task_struct. Use an #ifdef'ed static function for
>> archs that don't have a special arch_dup_task_struct implementation.
> 
> The patch is unreviewable (and hence unusable) if you don't describe
> this "potential gcc bug".
>

http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0804.3/3202.html

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/