Re: linux-next: Tree for April 29 (bpf_jit)

From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Fri Apr 29 2011 - 13:19:37 EST


Le vendredi 29 avril 2011 Ã 09:26 -0700, Randy Dunlap a Ãcrit :
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:19:40 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20110428:
>
>
> when CONFIG_MODULES is not enabled:
>
> bpf_jit_comp.c:(.text+0x43cc2): undefined reference to `module_free'
> (.text+0x4521a): undefined reference to `module_alloc'
> (.text+0x453af): undefined reference to `module_free'
>
>

Oh well, I guess we can add one 'depends on MODULES' like we do for
KPROBES (it also uses module_alloc())

Not sure many people build a !CONFIG_MODULES kernel these days...

Thanks Randy !

[PATCH net-next-2.6] bpf: depends on MODULES

module_alloc() and module_free() are available only if CONFIG_MODULES=y

Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
---
net/Kconfig | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/net/Kconfig b/net/Kconfig
index 745fb02..878151c 100644
--- a/net/Kconfig
+++ b/net/Kconfig
@@ -238,6 +238,7 @@ config HAVE_BPF_JIT
config BPF_JIT
bool "enable BPF Just In Time compiler"
depends on HAVE_BPF_JIT
+ depends on MODULES
---help---
Berkeley Packet Filter filtering capabilities are normally handled
by an interpreter. This option allows kernel to generate a native


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/