Re: [RFC] Regulator state after regulator_get

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 09:44:10AM +0000, kalle.jokiniemi@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

>  > Another alternative to the first option you proposed could be to add a
>  > flags field to regulator_consumer_supply, and use a flag to recognise
>  > regulators which need to be disabled during initialisation. The flag
>  > could be set by using a new macro e.g. REGULATOR_SUPPLY_NASTY() when
>  > defining the regulator.

> This sounds like a good option actually. Liam, Mark, any opinions?

I'm not sure what "supply_nasty" would mean?  This also doesn't seem
like something that we can set up per supply - it's going to affect the
whole regulator state, it's not something that only affects a single
supply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/