Re: [PATCH 0/4] munmap: Flexible mem unmap operation interface forscheduling latency

From: Geunsik Lim
Date: Mon Apr 25 2011 - 21:21:11 EST


On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 19:44 +0900, Geunsik Lim wrote:
>> Â Â Originally, We aim to not hold locks for too long (for scheduling latency reasons).
>> Â Â So zap pages in ZAP_BLOCK_SIZE byte counts.
>> Â Â This means we need to return the ending mmu_gather to the caller.
>
> Please have a look at the mmu_gather rewrite that hit -mm last week,
> that completely does away with ZAP_BLOCK_SIZE and renders these patches
> obsolete.
Yes. I also checked the patch that you stated at LKML mailing list previously.
In my thinking. I want to keep ZAP_BLOCK_SIZE related contents
that adjusted by Ingo, Robert, Andrew, and so on a long time ago
because I believe that we can overcome below problems sufficiently
in real world.
. LKML archive - http://lkml.org/lkml/2002/7/24/273
. LKML archive - http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/9/14/101

In my experience, I did overcome below problems with this patch
based on ZAP_BLOCK_SIZE.

1) To solve temporal CPU contention
(e.g: case that cpu contention is 93% ~ 96% according to mmap/munmap
to access mass files )
2) To get real-time or real-fast selectively on specified linux system
( demo: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxcgvDTY5F0 )


>
> Also, -rt doesn't care since it already has preemptible mmu_gather.
>
> Furthermore:
>
>> +L: Â Â linux-rt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sorry. I think that I have to add "linux-rt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" because this
patch is related to scheduling latencies although this modification
is in ./linux-2.6/mm/ directory. I will remove "+L: linux-rt-users******" if
really linux-rt-users mailing list can not care.
>
> is complete crap, linux-rt-users is _NOT_ a development list.
>
>



--
Regards,
Geunsik Lim ( Samsung Electronics )
Blog : http://blog.naver.com/invain/
e-Mail: geunsik.lim@xxxxxxxxxxx
    Â leemgs@xxxxxxxxx , leemgs1@xxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/