Re: [PATCH] fs: synchronize_rcu when unregister_filesystem successnot failure

[Mark Lord]

On 11-04-14 11:52 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Milton Miller <miltonm@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> While checking unregister_filesystem for saftey vs extra calls for
>> "ext4: register ext2 and ext3 alias after ext4" I realized that
>> the synchronize_rcu() was called on the error path but not on
>> the success path.
> 
> Good catch.
> 
> I think this is the bug that then caused us to do commit d863b50ab013
> ("vfs: call rcu_barrier after ->kill_sb()")
> 
> That said, that commit says that "synchronize_rcu()" isn't enough, and
> uses rcu_barrier().
> 
> Which _should_ mean that there are no actual users that care about RCU
> events by the time you actually hit "unregister_filesystem()".

Is that true of older kernels?  (eg. 2.6.38 has the same bug)

IOW, is this a -stable candidate?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/