Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree

[Ingo Molnar]

* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 13:14 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in kernel/sched.c
> > between commit 6631e635c65d ("block: don't flush plugged IO on forced
> > preemtion scheduling") from Linus' tree and commits 098247b90a9e ("sched:
> > Provide p->on_rq") and a3380736e4b3 ("sched: Also serialize ttwu_local()
> > with p->pi_lock") from the tip tree.
> > 
> > I fixed them up (hopefully - see below) and can carry the fix as
> > necessary. 
> 
> It looks like Ingo accidentially published an older version of these patches 
> because I also got a UP build error from Tony yesterday.

It was intentionally published.

> A new series was merged this morning which should hopefully address both 
> problems.

Yes.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/