Re: Processes hang in an unkillable state

[Robert ÅwiÄcki]

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> btw, here might be another path which hits this (at least I think so).
>
> So both mprotect and mlock will do the same "split/merge vma's as
> necessary", but neither of them should actually ever _expand_ a
> mapping or change the vm_pgoff of a vma (except to fix up the pgoff as
> a vma is split).
>
> So what I think is happening is that a previous vma operation (like
> the mremap or the stack expansion) did the expand and created a vma
> with a wrapping vm_pgoff. But nothing bad happened, because nobody
> really _cares_ about the wrapping until later, when we split the vma.
>
> So I think (and hope) that your mprotect issue is exactly the same as
> your mlock issue, and that the deeper problem was the earlier stack
> expansion.

So, after ~12h of testing I don't see any crashes. Currently, I'm
testing with 2.6.39-rc3 with 2 of your patches applied (1st patching
mlock.c/memory.c, 2nd: mmap.c).

It's still crashing with sys_madvise (as reported earlier), and I'm
going to re-enable all syscalls now (madvise, getdents(64), readdir),
which were disabled before. If something unrelated to the problems
discussed in this thread happens, I'll report it in another thread.

-- 
Robert ÅwiÄcki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/