Re: [PATCH -v2] x86: Remove dma32_reserve_bootmem

[Jesse Barnes]

On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:54:14 -0700
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 04/12/2011 10:47 AM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:20:48 -0700
> > Yinghai Lu<yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> That is workaround for holding dma32 buf when early bootmem could use up
> >> those range on system that have lots of RAM.
> >>
> >> Now x86 is using memblock, and even nobootmem wrapper do top-down allocation.
> >>
> >> So We could remove those not needed code now.
> >>
> >> -v2: rebase on pci-next
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu<yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >
> > Hm, still didn't apply cleanly, I guess the patch got corrupted.  I
> > fixed it up by hand and applied to linux-next though, thanks.
> 
> sorry for that. looks like recent thunderbird upgrade convert TAB to space..

Thanks for checking.  I wonder why every mailer (and some MTAs!) feel
the need to molest message content so thoroughly...

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/