Re: [PATCH v2] rfkill: Regulator consumer driver for rfkill

[Johannes Berg]

On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 13:41 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:

> > + * static struct regulator_consumer_supply pcap_regulator_V6_consumers [] = {
> > + * 	{ .dev_name = "rfkill-regulator.0", supply = "vrfkill" },
> > + * };
> 
> It's a comment, but it should be .supply = (missing the .)
> 
> > +	if (pdata->name == NULL || pdata->type == 0) {
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid name or type in platform data\n");
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	vcc = regulator_get_exclusive(&pdev->dev, "vrfkill");
> 
> Wasn't that supposed to use pdata->supply? Actually, there's no member
> "supply" in the struct?

Oh wait, I think I just misunderstood how this works. But if the name is
"vrfkill" how does that really work with multiple instances?

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/