Re: Q. locking order of dcache_lru_lock

[J. R. Okajima]

Peter Zijlstra:
> Not really a problem, locking order is simply a tool/scheme to avoid
> deadlocks. Since there is no deadlock potential its fine to 'violate'
> locking order.

I see.
Then lockdep always ignore all tyrlocks?

Thank you for answering.

J. R. Okajima
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/