Re: [PATCH 1/2] memblock: add error return when CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCKis not set

[Mike Travis]

Was there any further objections to these patches?

Mike Travis wrote:
> Subject: memblock: add error return when CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK is not set
> Author: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>     Add an error return if CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK is not set instead
>     of having to add #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK around blocks of
>     code calling that function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/memblock.h |    9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- linux.orig/include/linux/memblock.h
> +++ linux/include/linux/memblock.h
> @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
> #define _LINUX_MEMBLOCK_H
> #ifdef __KERNEL__
>
> +#define MEMBLOCK_ERROR    0
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
> /*
>  * Logical memory blocks.
> @@ -20,7 +22,6 @@
> #include <asm/memblock.h>
>
> #define INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS    128
> -#define MEMBLOCK_ERROR        0
>
> struct memblock_region {
>     phys_addr_t base;
> @@ -160,6 +161,12 @@ static inline unsigned long memblock_reg
> #define __initdata_memblock
> #endif
>
> +#else
> +static inline phys_addr_t memblock_alloc(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t 
> align)
> +{
> +    return MEMBLOCK_ERROR;
> +}
> +
> #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK */
>
> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/