Re: [PATCH] rfkill: Regulator consumer driver for rfkill

[Bernd Petrovitsch]

On Don, 2011-04-07 at 12:09 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: 
> On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 12:01 +0200, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> > On Mit, 2011-04-06 at 20:46 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: 
> > > On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 20:12 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > [...] 
> > > > But doesn't
> > > > 	depends on RFKILL || !RFKILL
> > > > 
> > > > always evaluate to true when running "make *config"? (Even if RFKILL is
> > > > an unknown symbol when that expression is parsed!)
> > > 
> > > No, it will not, you're forgetting that these things are tristate.
> > 
> > Boolean operators for tristate logic isn't intuitive at all IMHO.
> 
> *shrug*. You're free to propose patches to the kconfig system to make it
> more intuitive. :-)

FullACK;-)
But no intuitive tristate logic operators come to my mind (otherwise I
would have mentioned them above).
And there are more logic implications in "depends on RFKILL".
Hmm, I have to think more about it ....

Bernd
-- 
Bernd Petrovitsch                  Email : bernd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                     LUGA : http://www.luga.at

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/