Re: [PATCH] ARM: BUG() dies silently

[Stephen Boyd]

On 4/4/2011 6:55 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Yes I've seen your patch (and even posted comments on it which have not
>> been responded to).
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Not yet! Don't worry I will get to it. I like the suggestion and am
> pleased that you pointed me to it, thank you.
>

Great!

>> Correct me if I'm wrong, but that patch with CONFIG_BUG=n would lead to
>> the same error that Omar is seeing because the code only modifies the
>> bug infrastructure when CONFIG_BUG=y.
> Well if CONFIG_BUG=n then there is no bug infrastructure, The whole
> file is skipped and it falls back to the asm-generic/bug.h which has
> even more #ifdefs in it. But I think we end up here:
>
> #define BUG() do {} while(0)
>
> After all the patch removes the *(int*)0 = 0 code by virtue of
> CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG=y, right? If I have this wrong then I will have to
> break out the C preprocessor...
>

Ah you're right. Too many ifdefs going on there.

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/