Re: [patch 09/15] sched: add exports tracking cfs bandwidthcontrol statistics

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 20:03 -0700, Paul Turner wrote:
> @@ -1431,10 +1432,15 @@ static void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs
>         struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
>         struct sched_entity *se;
>         struct tg_unthrottle_down_data udd;
> +       struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b = tg_cfs_bandwidth(cfs_rq->tg);
>  
>         se = cfs_rq->tg->se[cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq))];
>  
>         update_rq_clock(rq);
> +       raw_spin_lock(&cfs_b->lock);
> +       cfs_b->throttled_time += (rq->clock - cfs_rq->throttled_timestamp);
> +       raw_spin_unlock(&cfs_b->lock);
> +       cfs_rq->throttled_timestamp = 0;
>  
>         /* don't include throttled window for load statistics */
>         udd.cpu = rq->cpu;

> @@ -1523,6 +1530,11 @@ static int do_sched_cfs_period_timer(str
>         raw_spin_lock(&cfs_b->lock);
>         cfs_b->runtime = runtime;
>         cfs_b->runtime_assigned = runtime_assigned;
> +
> +       /* update throttled stats */
> +       cfs_b->nr_periods++;

Aren't you under-counting the periods, shouldn't that be += overrun?

> +       if (throttled)
> +               cfs_b->nr_throttled++;

idem?

>         raw_spin_unlock(&cfs_b->lock);
>  
>         return idle;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/