Re: [PATCH] MTD: Retry Read/Write Transfer Buffer Allocations

From: Grant Erickson
Date: Mon Apr 04 2011 - 12:05:31 EST


On 4/4/11 12:27 AM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> [CCing LKML in a hope to get good suggestions]
> [The patch:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2011-April/034645.html]
>
> Hi Grant,
>
> Just in case, Jarkko was trying to address the same issue recently:
>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2011-March/034416.html
>
> This should be a bit more complex I think. First of all, I think it is
> better to make this a separate function. Second, you should make sure
> the system does not print scary warnings when the allocation fails - use
> __GFP_NOWARN flag, just like Jarkko did.
>
> An third, as I wrote in my answer to Jarkko, allocating large contiguous
> buffers is bad for performance: if the system memory is fragmented and
> there is no such large contiguous areas, the kernel will start writing
> back dirty FS data, killing FS caches, shrinking caches and buggers,
> probably even swapping out applications. We do not want MTD to cause
> this at all.
>
> Probably we can mitigate this with kmalloc flags. Now, I'm not sure what
> flags are the optimal, but I'd do:
>
> __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_WAIT | __GFP_NORETRY
>
> May be even __GFP_WAIT flag could be kicked out.

Artem:

Thanks for the feedback and the link to Jarkko's very similar patch. Your
suggestions will be incorporated into a subsequent patch.

For reference, I pursued a second uses-less-memory-but-is-more-complex
approach that does get_user_pages, builds up a series of iovecs for the page
extents. This worked well for all read cases I could test; however, for the
write case, the approach required yet more refinement and overhead since the
head and tail of the transfer need to be deblocked with read-modify-write
due to the NOTALIGNED checks in nand_base.c:nand_do_write_ops. I am happy to
share the work-in-progress with the list if anyone is interested.

I propose a two-stage approach. This issue has been in the kernel for about
six years.

Can we take a modified version of Jarkko's or my simpler fixes for the first
pass and then iterate toward the get_user_pages scatter/gather approach
later?

Best,

Grant


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/