Re: [PATCH][POKE] Skip looking for ioapic overrides when ioapics are not present

[Eric W. Biederman]

Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> writes:

> * Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> > * Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I don't have a clue why my patch got lost, [...]
>> >
>> > It was not lost, it broke the build. You were notified but never followed up 
>> > with a working patch:
>> >
>> >   https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/2/91
>> >
>> > and a different patch was applied to get rid of the warning messages. We can 
>> > apply your patch (and that patch can undo the other fix), but it has to build, 
>> > obviously.
>> 
>> Ingo any clue why I this message didn't make it to me directly but I
>> only received it through the linux-kernel?
>
> Hm, no idea - i did not receive any email bounce message.
>
> Did you get this one directly?

I did.  It looks like the gremlins in the network are at it again.
Thank you for looking.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/