Re: [PATCH 2/2] mutex: Apply adaptive spinning on mutex_trylock()

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 07:46 -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> 
> In this case, the only thing we're really missing is a way to mutex_lock
> without the cond_resched() 

So you're trying to explicitly avoid a voluntary preemption point? Seems
like a bad idea, normally people add those :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/