Re: [RFC] usbnet: use eth%d name for known ethernet devices

[Randy Dunlap]

On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:57:18 +0100 Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> On Wednesday 23 March 2011 20:53:13 MichaÅ Nazarewicz wrote:
> > On Mar 23, 2011 8:36 PM, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >  >
> >  > On Wednesday 23 March 2011 19:46:50 Greg KH wrote:
> >  > > > @@ -97,6 +97,8 @@ struct driver_info {
> >  > > >
> >  > > >  #define FLAG_LINK_INTR       0x0800          /* updates link (carrier) status */
> >  > > >
> >  > > > +#define FLAG_PTP     0x1000          /* maybe use "usb%d" names */
> >  > >
> >  > > "PTP"?  What does that stand for?
> >  >
> >  > point-to-point, I'll improve the comment to spell it out when I send the
> >  > fixed version.
> >  
> > I think P2P could be better.
> 
> Yes, good idea.

that's peer-to-peer.

OTOH, I knew that PTP was point-to-point.

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/