Re: [PATCH 0/6] Do not use sysdevs for implementing "core" PM operations on x86

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Tue Mar 22 2011 - 16:32:59 EST


On Tuesday, March 22, 2011, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > If there are no objectsions, I'd like to push these patches through the suspend
> > > tree.
> >
> > [1/8] has been merged in the meantime and [3/8] has been included into the
> > ACPI tree. if there are no objections, I'm going to push the following
> > patches to Linus this week through the suspend-2.6 tree:
> >
> > [1/6] - Convert sysdev users in arch/x86 to using struct syscore_ops.
> >
> > [2/6] - Make timekeeping use struct syscore_ops for suspend/resume.
> >
> > [3/6] - Make Intel IOMMU use struct syscore_ops for suspend/resume.
> >
> > [4/6] - Make KVM use struct syscore_ops for suspend/resume.
> >
> > [5/6] - Make cpufreq use struct syscore_ops for boot CPU suspend/resume.
> >
> > [6/6] - Introduce config switch allowing architectures to skip sysdev
> > suspend/resume/shutdown code.
>
> The x86 bits look fine.
>
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>

Thanks!

> The patches affect a lot of hardware so please make sure they are tested well
> before pushing them to Linus :-)

I have tested the majority, but unfortunately I have no hardware to test
the Intel IOMMU patch on it.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/