[02/78] VFS: Fix the nfs sillyrename regression in kernel 2.6.38

[Greg KH]

2.6.38-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit c83ce989cb5ff86575821992ea82c4df5c388ebc upstream.

The new vfs locking scheme introduced in 2.6.38 breaks NFS sillyrename
because the latter relies on being able to determine the parent
directory of the dentry in the ->iput() callback in order to send the
appropriate unlink rpc call.

Looking at the code that cares about races with dput(), there doesn't
seem to be anything that specifically uses d_parent as a test for
whether or not there is a race:
  - __d_lookup_rcu(), __d_lookup() all test for d_hashed() after d_parent
  - shrink_dcache_for_umount() is safe since nothing else can rearrange
    the dentries in that super block.
  - have_submount(), select_parent() and d_genocide() can test for a
    deletion if we set the DCACHE_DISCONNECTED flag when the dentry
    is removed from the parent's d_subdirs list.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>

---
 fs/dcache.c |    7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -296,8 +296,12 @@ static struct dentry *d_kill(struct dent
 	__releases(parent->d_lock)
 	__releases(dentry->d_inode->i_lock)
 {
-	dentry->d_parent = NULL;
 	list_del(&dentry->d_u.d_child);
+	/*
+	 * Inform try_to_ascend() that we are no longer attached to the
+	 * dentry tree
+	 */
+	dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_DISCONNECTED;
 	if (parent)
 		spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
 	dentry_iput(dentry);
@@ -1030,6 +1034,7 @@ static struct dentry *try_to_ascend(stru
 	 * or deletion
 	 */
 	if (new != old->d_parent ||
+		 (old->d_flags & DCACHE_DISCONNECTED) ||
 		 (!locked && read_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq))) {
 		spin_unlock(&new->d_lock);
 		new = NULL;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/