[PATCH] perf_events: fix Intel fixed counters base initialization

From: Stephane Eranian
Date: Sat Mar 19 2011 - 13:20:31 EST



The following patch solves the problems introduced by Robert's
commit 41bf498 and reported by Arun Sharma. This commit gets rid
of the base + index notation for reading and writing PMU msrs.

The problem is that for fixed counters, the new calculation for the
base did not take into account the fixed counter indexes, thus all
fixed counters were read/written from fixed counter 0. Although all
fixed counters share the same config MSR, they each have their own
counter register.

Without:
$ task -e unhalted_core_cycles -e instructions_retired -e baclears noploop 1
noploop for 1 seconds

242202299 unhalted_core_cycles (0.00% scaling, ena=1000790892, run=1000790892)
2389685946 instructions_retired (0.00% scaling, ena=1000790892, run=1000790892)
49473 baclears (0.00% scaling, ena=1000790892, run=1000790892)

With:
$ task -e unhalted_core_cycles -e instructions_retired -e baclears noploop 1
noploop for 1 seconds

2392703238 unhalted_core_cycles (0.00% scaling, ena=1000840809, run=1000840809)
2389793744 instructions_retired (0.00% scaling, ena=1000840809, run=1000840809)
47863 baclears (0.00% scaling, ena=1000840809, run=1000840809)

Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 87eab4a..8d637b9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -912,7 +912,8 @@ static inline void x86_assign_hw_event(struct perf_event *event,
hwc->event_base = 0;
} else if (hwc->idx >= X86_PMC_IDX_FIXED) {
hwc->config_base = MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR_CTRL;
- hwc->event_base = MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR0;
+ hwc->event_base = MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR0
+ + (hwc->idx - X86_PMC_IDX_FIXED);
} else {
hwc->config_base = x86_pmu_config_addr(hwc->idx);
hwc->event_base = x86_pmu_event_addr(hwc->idx);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/