Re: IIO comments

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Friday 18 March 2011, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > I guess if it's always in${i}-in${i+1}, it's still not too hard.
> I think they have been so far, but doubt this is universal.
> How about having a diff type and just having a pair of indices in the
> channel structure?  Actually may need a third for x^2+y^2+z^2 devices.
> (iirc there are parts that do x^2+y^2 despite also having a z channel)
> ...

If two identifiers are common, that would probably be fine.

If you have a x^2+y^2+z^2 device, it might be easier to call that
a different type with a fixed name, as long as there is a small
number of combinations.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/