Re: [RFC 2/2] x86, dumpstack: use %pT format specifier for stacktrace

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Fri Mar 18 2011 - 11:30:10 EST


You needed to add the x86 maintainers to your Cc list.

-- Steve

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 08:21:18PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
> index 914065620f2c..809d027de28f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static int die_counter;
>
> void printk_address(unsigned long address, int reliable)
> {
> - printk(" [<%p>] %s%pS\n", (void *) address,
> + printk(" [<%p>] %s%pT\n", (void *) address,
> reliable ? "" : "? ", (void *) address);
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/