Re: [PATCH] Allow LAPB users know which data were actually sent.

[Alan Cox]

> > Looks sensible but your patch doesn't add a user for it so what is it
> > needed for ?
> 
> I implement accessor for special equipment (acessing fiscal information)
> which uses custom protocol over LAPB. As it is being implemented,
> I actually wanted to know if this approach for using LAPB is good enough
> for mainline submission, as I want to have kernel part to be in mainline.
> I think I will have the rest of patches ready within two weeks.

It seems sensible as an implementation to me so I would carry on using
that model and then submit it with all the other bits when you are ready.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/