Re: [14/17] nfsd: wrong index used in inner loop

From: J. Bruce Fields
Date: Thu Mar 17 2011 - 19:00:58 EST


On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:21:58PM +0000, Tim Gardner wrote:
> On 03/11/2011 08:40 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> >
> >------------------
> >
> >From: roel<roel.kluin@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >commit 3ec07aa9522e3d5e9d5ede7bef946756e623a0a0 upstream.
> >
> >Index i was already used in the outer loop
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin<roel.kluin@xxxxxxxxx>
> >Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields<bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman<gregkh@xxxxxxx>
> >
> >---
> > fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> >--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> >+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> >@@ -1114,7 +1114,7 @@ nfsd4_decode_create_session(struct nfsd4
> >
> > u32 dummy;
> > char *machine_name;
> >- int i;
> >+ int i, j;
> > int nr_secflavs;
> >
> > READ_BUF(16);
> >@@ -1187,7 +1187,7 @@ nfsd4_decode_create_session(struct nfsd4
> > READ_BUF(4);
> > READ32(dummy);
> > READ_BUF(dummy * 4);
> >- for (i = 0; i< dummy; ++i)
> >+ for (j = 0; j< dummy; ++j)
> > READ32(dummy);
> > break;
> > case RPC_AUTH_GSS:
> >
> >
> >--
>
> I agree that fixing the index in this loop is a good thing, but its
> caused me to look at the result:
>
> for (j = 0; j< dummy; ++j)
> READ32(dummy);
>
> It seems to me that this loop might never terminate if the original
> buffer is maliciously constructed, e.g., 0, 1, 2, 3, ... Is the data
> in this buffer really that well vetted?

Agreed, the code's still clearly bogus. In fact, we can just delete
that loop entirely; I have a patch queued up to send to Linus soon.

(But go ahead and apply this anyway, and then you'll get the followup
patch when it lands.)

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/